Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Little help interpreting spectral data from an article

  1. Jun 14, 2018 #1
    I'm trying to find a good database of absorption or reflection spectra in visible light for pigments.

    I've found a wonderful database in this article: http://e-conservation.org/issue-2/36-FORS-spectral-database#CSV

    It's almost exactly what I needed

    Except I don't understand the data

    The graphs in the article show a lot of reflectance values over 100% (and doesn't explain them) and the data in the CSV files have both numbers greater than 100 and lower than 0 (negative numbers), not to mention I don't know if those values are percentages (the same on the graphs of the article) or some signal intensity value.

    I can't seem to find explanation for these things on the article.

    Can anyone help me?

    Thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 14, 2018 #2

    mjc123

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I assume the numbers in the csv files are the same as the percentages in the graphs. The article explains that reflectance values are not absolute but are with reference to a white reflectance standard. If the sample reflects more strongly than the reference, the reflectance value is > 100%. The few negative numbers look like just the result of noise at low wavelengths.
     
  4. Jun 14, 2018 #3

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Seems crazy, on the face of it. There must be something in the 'small print' that allows for >100% reflectance. I have been skipping around a number of Google hits and the reference seems to be a 99% Spectralon diffuse reflectance standard, whatever that is. That makes it even more weird.
    On the face of it, you'd need some frequency shifting mechanism to get more out at a given frequency than is put in. Fluorescence happens in some materials but I thought it needed UV energies.
     
  5. Jun 14, 2018 #4

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    this isn't my field of expertise
    Am some others will chime in

    @Dale @Andy Resnick


    this comment in the introduction explains that part of the query


    I am just also not sure how more than 100% is achieved ?


    yes, exactly
     
  6. Jun 14, 2018 #5

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I guess this is so familiar to the 'experts' that they don't even feel the need to explain it away. Or perhaps it takes a Physicist to even notice something like this??? We have a 'learned intuition'.
     
  7. Jun 14, 2018 #6

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    I've done a lot of these kinds of measurements, there could be a number of reasons why reflectance measurements > 100%, and unfortunately, I couldn't get a clear understanding of the measurement method from the article. For example: it's not clear if the reflectance measurement is 'normal' reflection or retroreflection (back reflection). It could be 'normal' (http://oceanoptics.com//wp-content/uploads/example-setup-reflectance-1.jpg), but it's not explicit. For normal incidence this doesn't matter, but it does for 45-degree angle incidence. Also, I didn't see in the article where they discuss a 'reflection standard': not only could certain materials reflect more than a standard material (like spectralon), if the material is more specular than the diffuse standard, the reflectance measurement could >100%.

    A more complete reflectance specification is the 'bi-directional reflectance distribution function':

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidirectional_reflectance_distribution_function

    One other (probably minor) effect: the authors mention some of the pigments fluoresce; if they illuminate the sample with white light some of the short-wavelength energy will convert to longer wavelengths increasing the apparent reflectance.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted