Load Balancing: Can't understand the summation term

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around understanding the summation term in the context of load balancing, specifically the expression involving the summation of terms related to processing time. Participants are exploring the meaning and implications of the notation used in the summation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Zulfi, expresses confusion about the term "Summation of (j tj)" and questions whether it involves multiplication.
  • Another participant clarifies that the summation simply sums the terms, providing an example of a summation to illustrate the concept.
  • Zulfi acknowledges the clarification and seeks confirmation that the expression does not involve multiplying j with tj.
  • A further response explains that j serves as an index for the summation, likening it to a "for" loop in programming.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not appear to have significant disagreement, as participants are clarifying the meaning of the summation rather than contesting different viewpoints. However, Zulfi's initial confusion indicates a lack of understanding that is being addressed through the responses.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the limits of the summation were not specified, which may lead to further confusion regarding the range of j.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals seeking clarification on summation notation in mathematical contexts, particularly in relation to load balancing and processing time calculations.

zak100
Messages
462
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
Hi,
I am trying to understand a summation term related to load balancing
I can’t understand the term Summation of (j tj). Are we multiplying j and tj. But the text is not talking about multiplying, it says”Total processing time
cant understand summation term.jpg


Somebody please guide me.

Zulfi.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
the summation just sums the terms.

##\sum_{n=0}^{10}{(2n+1)} = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 21##

in your case:

##\sum_{j=1}^{m}{(t_j)} = t_1 + t_2 + t_3 + ...##

but they left out the limits of j=1 to m.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zak100
Hi,
Thanks for your response.

You mean its not multiplying j with ##t_j##
##\sum_j t_j ##

Thanks.

God bless you.

Zulfi.
 
The j is saying that is the index the summation indexes over rather like a “for”loop in programming j is the “for” loop index.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K