Load Distribution/Rigid Body Equilibirum Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhchex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Load
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a rigid body equilibrium problem involving load distribution. The participant calculated the resultant force as -48i -36j [N] and the moment as -308N*m but expressed uncertainty about the accuracy of these values. To establish an equivalent loading at point A, it's essential to ensure that both the net force and net moment are preserved when shifting forces to point A. This involves summing the moments about point A due to the applied forces and incorporating any applied moments. Properly accounting for these factors is crucial for achieving equilibrium in the system.
jhchex
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem statement is attached to the image.

Homework Equations


ƩFx = 0
ƩFy = 0
ƩMa = 0.


The Attempt at a Solution


So I summed the forces in both x&y and found the resultant force to be = -48i -36j [N].
I summed to moments and got -308N*m, but I am not sure if that makes sense. I don't know how I am supposed to show an equivalent loading at A.
 

Attachments

  • problem1help.png
    problem1help.png
    25.3 KB · Views: 400
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you may need to check your moment summation again, but i could be wrong (i just glanced at the problem quick)...

Anyway it seems like you are more stumped on the concept. What you are doing is taking a system (bar in this case) that is being loaded in two ways:
1. applied forces- that also create moments
2. applied moment
and converting it to an equivalent system. To make it an equivalent system the same net force must act on it and the same net moment moment must act on it.

If we want to take an equivalent system about 'a' then we need to "shift" the applied forces to 'a'. This will take care of the net force being equal. BUT we also need to account for the moment the forces caused about 'a'. To do this we simply sum moments about 'a' due to the forces. Lastly we still need to account for the applied moment in the middle of the beam which simply adds (or subtracts) to the moment from the forces.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top