Local to global transformation; end rotational displacments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of converting local axis displacements and rotations of a pipe into global coordinates for analysis. The user describes a scenario where the pipe's orientation changes due to bends, complicating the application of rotations in the software, which only accepts global values. A suggestion is made to use a Direction Cosine Matrix (DCM) to address the rotation issue, with emphasis on defining axes and applying fundamental rotations to achieve the desired global orientation. The user seeks clarification on the applicability of DCM for rotations and has provided a diagram for better understanding. The conversation highlights the technical complexities involved in transforming local to global coordinates in engineering applications.
aa2105
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am analysing some piping which starts off as being aligned with the global axis system (X Y Z). So axially its X, laterally is Y and Z is vertically upwards. Due to bends etc. the end of the pipe is in a different orientation though still in the same plane - now the local axis system is x y z. However, the software I'm using can only accept global values. I need to impose displacements and rotations at the ends of the pipe. For displacements, this is easy - its simply the displacement multiplied by the cosine of the angle which the pipe makes (lets call it theta) with the global X-axis.

However, I am unsure what to do for rotations. Clearly, as the pipe remains in the same plane the Z axis and z axis will remain unchanged. But X and Y have been rotated by theta.

Now if I want to apply a 1.5deg rotation at the end about the local y and z axes - how can I get the equivalent rotation in global terms?

I hope this makes sense... if not I can add some more detail.

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards,

Adders
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you could provide some sort of sketch for your setup that would be helpful.

This sounds like a simple DCM (direction cosine matrix) problem, with angles as a function of angles. The easiest way to start is to define axes from your point of interest and make fundamental rotations until you get to your global axes.
 
Thanks for the early response - but are you sure one can apply the DCM for rotations?

I've attached a diagram anyhow.

Cheers.

A
 

Attachments

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top