Understanding Geosynchronous Orbits for Communication Satellites

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaypee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
Communications satellites typically operate in geosynchronous orbits to maintain a fixed position above Earth, allowing antennas to remain aimed at a constant point. The orbital period for these satellites is approximately 24 hours relative to the Sun. While geosynchronous orbits are common for television broadcasts due to cost efficiency, not all communication satellites require this orbit; a network of satellites can provide coverage without being geosynchronous. The high expense of launching satellites into geosynchronous orbit is a significant factor in their use for TV, as it simplifies the technology needed for satellite dishes. Overall, geosynchronous orbits are preferred for specific applications, but alternatives exist for broader coverage.
jaypee
Communications satellites must be in geosynchronous orbits. That is, they must remain above a fixed point on Earth’s surface, enabling sending and receiving antennas to be aimed at a fixed point overhead. What, then, must be a communication satellite’s orbital period (the time for one complete orbit around Earth)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a textbook problem. My guess is that, relative to the Earth, the orbital period is infinite, relative to the Sun, 24 hours, and relative to the cosmic background, 23 hours 56 minutes 4.09 seconds.
 
Booda is correct and that should be self evident. Clarification though - comms satellites do NOT necessarily need to be in geo orbit. If you have enough of them you can ensure one is overhead at all times.
 
Yes, communication satelites can broadcast over wide areas, so not all systems need to be in a geo-sync orbit, the main systems that use geo-sync are TV, because they can't afford 20 satellites to cover all the Earth at once, that is why you always point your dish towards the equator.
 
the main systems that use geo-sync are TV, because they can't afford 20 satellites to cover all the Earth at once, that is why you always point your dish towards the equator.
Actually given the expense of launching a satellite into geo orbit, I believe the reason they do it with tv satellites is the difficulty in having every dish actively track satellites.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top