I Looking for a cheap digital scale with accuracy <1 g

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a budget-friendly digital scale with accuracy below 1 gram. Users highlight issues with existing scales that struggle with precision in the 0-1 g range, often displaying erratic readings. Recommendations include powder scales designed for weighing gunpowder, which typically offer better accuracy, with some models available for under $20. One participant shares a positive experience with a recently purchased scale that claims 0.001 g accuracy and has proven reliable after calibration. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accuracy and consistency in low-weight measurements.
joniverson
Messages
44
Reaction score
13
I currently have a cheap digital scale that will measure, say, from 1 g and beyond to the hundredth place with reasonable accuracy, but for anything less than a gram, it is erratic. For example, when I'm adding 0.15 g of a chemical, sometimes the value will change but often it will not and whatever reading the scale already displayed remains. Obviously, this behavior jeopardizes accuracy. The scale I have is here. Not expensive and was hoping to find something similar with better accuracy in the aforementioned range (0-1 g to 0.01). Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I doubt anybody could get better than half gram accuracy with a scale of that style. Especially one that costs less than $7. That is based on my experience. Our business uses a scale, which have a resolution of 1 gram and costs over $100. I could be wrong, and maybe the technology now exists.
 
Amazon has some cheap and cheerful powder scales.
You could always calibrate a cheap set with some standard weights. That would still rely on consistent performance but you could spend some time to see if temperature correlates with the error.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
Thanks, all. Sophiecentaur, I ordered one similar to the ones you linked to a couple of days ago. It was just under $20 US with a claimed accuracy into the 0.001 g range. It arrived today and, using the included instructions, I calibrated it to read very close to actual values. I'm very happy with it and it will do what I am seeking. It won't measure the weight of an eyelash, but it will a small square of paper (roughly 10 mg). The top also closes to avoid air disturbances. If it continues to work well, a true bargain.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
joniverson said:
Thanks, all. Sophiecentaur, I ordered one similar to the ones you linked to a couple of days ago. It was just under $20 US with a claimed accuracy into the 0.001 g range. It arrived today and, using the included instructions, I calibrated it to read very close to actual values. I'm very happy with it and it will do what I am seeking. It won't measure the weight of an eyelash, but it will a small square of paper (roughly 10 mg). The top also closes to avoid air disturbances. If it continues to work well, a true bargain.
In Chemistry class, we had one which was inside a glass case to prevent moving air from affecting the measurement
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top