Stargazing Looking for images of same object, but with different telescope sizes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nukeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images Telescope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the request for images of celestial objects like Jupiter and Andromeda captured through telescopes of varying sizes, particularly focusing on the capabilities of a 6-inch Dobsonian telescope. Users share their experiences with different telescopes and imaging techniques, noting that while Dobsonians are typically not used for imaging, a 6-inch Newtonian can still produce quality images. Astronomy software is recommended for simulating field of view and potential images. The conversation also touches on the differences in exposure times and equipment used, which can affect image quality and comparison. Overall, the thread provides insights into telescope imaging and the expectations for a 6-inch Dobsonian.
nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Iv been looking for this, but can't seem to put it together.

Mainly I am looking for images of the same object, like Jupiter or andromeda, with various sizes of telescopes, showing the difference in image of small telescopes to large ones.

Like, a small dob, to a 6, to a 8 and beyond. Kinda like that.

Anyone help me out?

Thanks! :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've imaged several objects with several different telescopes: http://www.russsscope.net/

Among them:
-Jupiter, Saturn and Mars with two different telescopes and three different cameras and various Barlow lenses.
-The Orion Nebula with two different telescopes, plus a 135mm SLR lens and two different cameras.

You can also use astronomy software to calculate a field of view for you and show you a simulation of what you'd see.
 
Wow, VERY nice images!

I am looking for images a 6 inch dob is capable of?

I am VERY new to telescopes, and just picked up a 6inch dob on sale, and a 2 inch adapter.

Want to see some images a 6 inch dob is able to make.

Thanks


russ_watters said:
I've imaged several objects with several different telescopes: http://www.russsscope.net/

Among them:
-Jupiter, Saturn and Mars with two different telescopes and three different cameras and various Barlow lenses.
-The Orion Nebula with two different telescopes, plus a 135mm SLR lens and two different cameras.

You can also use astronomy software to calculate a field of view for you and show you a simulation of what you'd see.
 
Dobs aren't usually used for imaging but 6" Newtonians can be. See http://www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=optical_tube/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=09786/~sSearchSession=730afff3-3088-4236-ab21-d0f87fc83ac4", for example.

http://home.comcast.net/~patforster/astro/m57nebulosity.jpg" Notice the differences in scale. There are differences in exposure times, cameras, focal length, etc... which makes comparisons less straightforward.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
a beautiful set of pix Russ, makes me severely miss the dark skies I had back in New Zealand and the astro photo's my friend and I did on many cold dark nites.


clarification... a dob (Dobsonian) is a Newtonian scope. the "dob just describes the type of mount that the Newtonian is in (Alt-Az) as a difference from an equatorial mount.

my current scope is a 8" f4.5 Dobsonian mount
An interesting thing is that many of the very large research scopes these days are often a Dob style mount. They are, just as a home dobo scope would be, easy to guide with computer control :)

Dave
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
226
Views
15K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top