Looking for someone to check my chem. questions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter peck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem
AI Thread Summary
Beryllium fluoride (BeF2) is expected to be linear due to its two bonding pairs of electrons, resulting in a 180-degree angle between fluorine atoms. In contrast, sulfur difluoride (SF2) is angular because the presence of lone pairs on the sulfur atom causes repulsion, leading to a bond angle of approximately 109 degrees. The hybridization of one d, one s, and two p orbitals results in dsp2 hybrid orbitals, producing four hybrid orbitals in total. The discussion also highlights that the solid state of C20H40 at 25 degrees Celsius is attributed to stronger intermolecular forces compared to the gaseous state of C4H8, which has fewer electrons and weaker forces. Overall, the thread seeks confirmation on the accuracy of these chemical explanations.
peck
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1Q. Explain why you would expect a BeF2 molecule to be linear but a SF2 molecule to be angular?

A. Beryllium fluoride would be linear because each of the two valence electrons in a beryllium atom is shared with an electron from a fluorine atom. Using the valence electron-pair repulsion theory applied to two electron pairs, we would perdict that the angle between the fluorine atoms to be 180deg. The central atom uses all of its bonding electrons to bond to two identical atoms.
SF2, when two atoms are bonded to a third, the resulting molecules are angular if unbonded outer electrons are present in the central atom. The two fluorine atoms would repel at a 109deg.

2aQ. How would you designate the hybrid orbitals formed by "mixing" one d, one s, and two p orbitals?

A. The hybrid orbitals formed would be dsp2.

b) How many hybrid orbitals would be formed by the "mixing"?

A. The number of hybrid orbitals formed would be 4. The total number of orbitals you put in are equal to the number of hybrid orbitals you get.

3Q. Explain why C20H40 is a solid @ 25degcel, while C4H8 is a gas @ 25degcel?

A. C20H40 is a larger compound having more atoms than C4H8 therefore having more electrons. The forces in C20H40 are a lot greater that C4H8 making C20H40 harder to break down resulting in a higher boiling point that C4H8.

Am I on the right track here? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peck said:
C20H40 is a larger compound having more atoms than C4H8 therefore having more electrons. The forces in C20H40 are a lot greater that C4H8 making C20H40 harder to break down resulting in a higher boiling point that C4H8.

Am I on the right track here? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Melting is not about breaking down, it is about intermolecular forces.

For the first question think in terms of hybrydization.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top