Lorentz Boost Help: Why Use Hyperbolic Functions?

fys iks!
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I was reading a section on lorentz boosts and i need some help understanding what they did:

the book starts off by defining the line element dS where:

(dS)^2 = -(CΔt)^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2

then they say: "consider the analogs of rotations in the (ct) plane. These transformations leave y and z unchanged but mix ct and x. The transformations with this character that leave the analogies of rotations of (3.9) but with trig functions replaced by hyperbolic functions because of the non euclidean nature of space time. Specifically

ct= [cosh(theta)]*[ct] - [sinh(theta)]*x
x = [sinh(theta)]*[ct] + {cosh(theta)]*x
y= y
z = z

and 3.9 was

x = cos(gamma)*x - sin(gamma)*y
y = sin(gamma)*x + cos(gamma) * y


So what i don't understand is why did they decide to use the hyperbolic functions in 4 dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fys iks! said:
So what i don't understand is why did they decide to use the hyperbolic functions in 4 dimensions?

If you use a transformation with an ordinary sin and cos in it, you get a rotation. If you keep on rotating the x-t plane, at some point you'll have rotated it so it's 180 degrees upside-down. At that point you've reversed the direction of time. This violates causality.
 
Thanks! That helped out a lot.

So by using hyperbolic sin/cos they were able to create the same shift without violating causality.

Do you have any links that further explain this in more detail?
 
So what i don't understand is why did they decide to use the hyperbolic functions in 4 dimensions?
You have not been paying attention, have you. An ordinary rotation in 3D space leaves the length of a vector unchanged, where the length element is ds^2=dx^2+dy^2+dz^2. Rotating this by \theta gives in the xy plane gives

<br /> ds&#039;^2= (cos(\theta)dx+sin(\theta)dy)^2+(sin(\theta)dx-cos(\theta)dy)^2+dz^2<br />
and because cos(\theta)^2+sin(\theta)^2=1 it follows that ds&#039;=ds.

In the ct-plane, we wish to preserve ds^2=dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2. If you do the calculation as above with cosh and sinh instead, you find ds&#039;=ds because cosh(\theta)^2-sinh(\theta)^2=1. The geometry of the cx plane is not Euclidean.

[posted simultaneously with bcrowell]
 
fys iks! said:
Thanks! That helped out a lot.

So by using hyperbolic sin/cos they were able to create the same shift without violating causality.

Do you have any links that further explain this in more detail?

http://www.lightandmatter.com/area1book6.html
 
In 4 dimensional spacetime intervals of constant length are hyperbolas. Also it is sometimes easier to work with hyperbolic functions

<br /> tanh(\theta) = v/c<br />

The addition of velocities is reduced to adding hyperbolic functions.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top