Lorentz boost to obtain parallel E and B fields?

Xavier1900
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose given an electric field \vec{E} and a magnetic field \vec{B} in some inertial frame. Determine the conditions under which there exists a Lorentz transformation to another inertial frame in which \vec{E} || \vec{B}

Homework Equations


If we give a Lorentz boost along x_1-direction, then in the boosted frame, electric and magnetic fields are given by
E_1&#039; = E_1\\<br /> E_2&#039; = \gamma (E_2 - \beta B_3)\\<br /> E_3&#039; = \gamma (E_3 + \beta B_2)
And similar for components of B fields.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with a frame in which the fields are parallel and see what kind of fields I can obtain after the transformation. The case where the boost is along the direction of E//B fields is trivial. Then I consider the case where I boost in the direction perpendicular to the E//B fields. By the equations I listed I find that I can produce E and B fields with some angle depending on \beta. But I am not seeing how I can go further from here. Am I in the right direction? Or should I try some other approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to approach problems like these is to construct invariants - i.e quantities that are the same in all frames. For example, given a four-vector A, the quantity A^\mu A_\mu has the same value in all frames. It turns out there are two invariants that can be constructed from the electromagnetic field tensor F^{\mu \nu}, and hence from E and B. Try to discover what these are - this will help answer the question.
 
phyzguy said:
One way to approach problems like these is to construct invariants - i.e quantities that are the same in all frames. For example, given a four-vector A, the quantity A^\mu A_\mu has the same value in all frames. It turns out there are two invariants that can be constructed from the electromagnetic field tensor F^{\mu \nu}, and hence from E and B. Try to discover what these are - this will help answer the question.

Thanks for the hint. I realize that F_{\rho \sigma}\tilde{F}^{\rho\sigma} = -4 \vec{B}\cdot \vec{E}, which is a scalar. That means if E//B in one frame, \vec{E}\cdot \vec{B} \neq 0 in all frames. Thus I just need to find the right Lorentz boost for systems like that. I will try and see what I can find.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top