I am slightly confused with the invariance of four-volume element. The orthodox way to show it is to prove that Jacobian is one, that I did, however in many textbooks I find a reasoning that because we have Lorentz contraction on one hand and time dilation on the other hand, the product is invariant then. I can not agree with that:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The problem can be stated like this: one has a cube of sides [itex] \Delta x [/itex] which lives only for time [itex] \Delta t [/itex]. What are the sides and life of the cube in moving reference frame?

I think that solution is like this: in moving reference frame there will be a length contraction but time also will seem to shorter [itex] ds = dt \sqrt{1-v^2} [/itex] so the product is not invariant.

Am i wrong? would appreciate any answer, spent lots of time on thinking about it.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lorentz invariance of four-volume element [itex] d^4x [/itex]

Loading...

Similar Threads - Lorentz invariance four | Date |
---|---|

A Corollaries of Lorentz Invariance | Sep 20, 2017 |

I Why is energy not Lorentz invariant? | Jul 30, 2016 |

I Newtonian analogue for Lorentz invariant four-momentum norm | Jun 22, 2016 |

I Motivation for the usage of 4-vectors in special relativity | May 4, 2016 |

Four vectors and Lorentz invariance | May 9, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**