I Lorentz Symmetry at Black Hole Event Horizon

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17
Hello people,
I have been thinking about a concept that I was taught whilst learning GR, If I understand correctly it is that Lorentz symmetry becomes local when we consider GR. This makes sense to me as then the metric is generally speaking not Minkowski, only for a sufficiently small area with no mass/energy present.

So my question is this, as you approach a black hole is it correct to say that the local area in which lorentz symmetry holds gets smaller?

If so can it then be inferred that the symmetry is broken at event horizon?

Thanks in advance for your time :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
If I understand correctly it is that Lorentz symmetry becomes local when we consider GR.

This is true, but you have to be clear about what that means. It means that Lorentz symmetry is not a symmetry of spacetime at all. It's a symmetry of the tangent space at each point.

Milsomonk said:
This makes sense to me as then the metric is generally speaking not Minkowski, only for a sufficiently small area with no mass/energy present.

Even if there is no stress-energy present, the metric will not be Minkowski in general. For example, Schwarzschild spacetime is a vacuum solution, but the metric is not Minkowski anywhere; it's curved everywhere.

Milsomonk said:
as you approach a black hole is it correct to say that the local area in which lorentz symmetry holds gets smaller?

You are confusing local Lorentz symmetry with the equivalence principle. In general, as tidal gravity increases (which it will as you get closer to any gravitating body, black hole or otherwise), given a fixed measurement accuracy, the area over which tidal effects will be negligible gets smaller. But that only tells you the area over which you can approximate the actual curved spacetime with a small patch of flat spacetime. It doesn't change anything about the Lorentz symmetry of the tangent space at a point.

Milsomonk said:
If so can it then be inferred that the symmetry is broken at event horizon?

No. See above.
 
Just to add to what PeterDonis says - given a large enough black hole, GR predicts that you can cross the event horizon with no ill effect. Spacetime is still locally flat enough that you won't feel a thing. You can't escape, and you'll be shredded before you reach the singularity. But it's locally flat spacetime all the way in - for increasingly local meanings of local and give or take the eventual inaccuracy of GR near the predicted singularity.
 
I understand, thanks for the clarification, I was thinking it would be local for a patch in the same sense you consider the equivalence principle, cheers guys :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
4K
Back
Top