Lorentz Transforms: Question About Inverting LT Frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter exmarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz
exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
If I construct a LT from an un-prime frame to a prime fame: S':=LT(S,v') and another to a double prime system: S":=LT(S,v"), then invert the first: S:=LT(S',-v') and substitute it into the second: S":=LT([LT(S',-v')],v"), I do NOT get the same transform as going directly between the double and single prime frames: LT([LT(S',-v')],v") ≠LT(S',[v"-v']). Does this question make any sense? What am I missing?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When going from S' to S'', what velocity did you use?

Realize that if v' is the relative velocity of S and S' and v'' is the relative velocity of S and S'', then the relative velocity of S' and S'' is not simply v'' - v'.
 
Last edited:
Oh? I thought it would be v"-v'. What is it then?

Thanks.
 
Ok, I get it. I have to use the SRT addition of velocities. Thanks!
 
exmarine said:
Ok, I get it. I have to use the SRT addition of velocities.
Right!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top