Lorrain & Corson: Help with Derivation of Fig 18.9/7.20

  • Thread starter Thread starter classy cal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the substitution of dl with acos(phi)dphi in Lorrain & Corson's Figure 18.9 (or Figure 7.20 in the second edition). The key point is that dl has a magnitude of a dφ, and the derivation emphasizes the importance of the y-component of A, which incorporates the factor of cos(φ). Additionally, the text clarifies that the x-component of A is zero, as explained between equations 7.99 and 7.100. This understanding is crucial for accurately interpreting the equations in the context of the problem. The forum participants aim to clarify these derivations for better comprehension.
classy cal
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
can someone help me with a derivation in L&C. I am wrestling with Figure 18.9 (Fig 7.20 in second edition) . In Equations 18.36 and 18.37 (7.99 and 7.100), the element dl is substituted with acos(phi)dphi and I cannot see how this is derived.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums! I have the 2nd edition of this book.

dl has a magnitude of a dφ. Moreover, we are only interested in the y-component of A, hence the additional factor of cos(φ). (The book explains, between equations 7.99 and 7.100, why the x-component of A must be zero.)
 
Many thanks Redbelly.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top