A Why Can't a Lower Energy Photon Remain After Pair Production?

AI Thread Summary
In pair production, a photon with energy exceeding 1.02 MeV creates an electron-positron pair along with the nucleus, but a lower energy photon cannot remain due to conservation laws and interaction dynamics. Although theoretically possible, the production of a lower energy photon is highly suppressed by the fine structure constant and phase space factors. The interaction requires an additional electromagnetic vertex in the Feynman diagram, complicating the process and making it less probable. The final state is predominantly a three-body interaction involving the nucleus, positron, and electron. Thus, while lower energy photon production is not forbidden, it is extremely unlikely in practice.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
In pair production, if the photon has an energy greater than 1.02 MeV, why can't a lower energy photon remain after creation of the electron-positron pair? For example, if you have a 10 MeV photon interacting with a carbon nucleus, why are the stated products of pair production the carbon nucleus, positron, and electron? Why can't a final photon with energy between ## 0 < E_\gamma < 8.98## MeV exist afterwards from this interaction with the carbon nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In principle, there is nothing forbidding this. However, the rate of this occurring is going to be suppressed by the fine structure constant and some phase space factor.
 
Orodruin said:
In principle, there is nothing forbidding this. However, the rate of this occurring is going to be suppressed by the fine structure constant and some phase space factor.

Do you mind providing a resource/explanation discussing this calculation and why it's unlikely by a factor of the fine structure constant/phase space difference?
 
It should be pretty obvious at A level. The Feynman diagram needs an extra electromagnetic vertex and it is a 3-body final state.
 
  • Like
Likes TheCanadian
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top