Magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating

AI Thread Summary
Permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary copper or aluminum tube generate Eddy currents, leading to Joule heating. An alternating polarity configuration (NSNS) is believed to heat the stator faster than a constant polarity configuration (NNNN) due to greater variation in the magnetic field. However, both configurations may require the same torque to turn the rotor because the Lorentz force remains consistent as the stator passes each magnet. The increased heating from the alternating configuration is attributed to a more significant change in the magnetic field, which enhances eddy current generation. Ultimately, experimentation with both configurations is recommended to validate these theories.
positron96
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Watch this video:

Permanent magnets moving relative to a stationary copper tube generate Eddy currents which result in Joule heating of the copper. Simple enough.

Let's change the problem to a rotor with 4 (circumferential) permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary (aluminum or copper) tube at some given RPM.

1. Which would heat the stator faster: magnets placed in alternating polarity (NSNS) or the same polarity (NNNN) around the rotor? I think it would be alternating because an area element on the stator would see more variation in the field per revolution.

2. Which would require more torque to turn the rotor: alternating or constant? I think they would be the same because the field strength and relative velocity are the same as the stator element passes each magnet, so the Lorentz force should be the same for both configurations.

3. Why does the alternating magnet configuration generate more heat but require the same amount of torque? Where did I go wrong?

Any links or references would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If one configuration achieves greater heating, it follows that its rotation will demand greater torque. There is no such thing as a free lunch!

I think you should build both and experiment. :smile:
 
Any eddy currents produced in the pipe would produce a counter magnetic field apposing the "changing" magnetic field of the rotating magnets. if the magnets have all the same poles, then the change in the magnetic field is mainly a change in field intensity, but if you have alternating field poles you have a complete cycle of the magnetic field from a maximum positive direction, then through a point with no magnetic influence, then a maximum field strength in the opposite polarity, resulting in a much larger change in the magnetic field over the same time period. Only a change in the magnetic field across the pipe creates eddy currents. You get much the same effect from running a single current carrying conductor through an electrical metallic conduit due to the alternating magnetic field created by the alternating current traveling through the wire. that's why you always run the return conductor through the conduit to cancel out the magnetic fields of the feed conductor, or you run multi phase conductors all together in the same conduit for the same reason. The alternating field poles would create more heat at the same angular velocity as an armature with the same poles, and would require more torque to operate.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top