Magnetic field inside a cylinder with an offset hole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the magnetic field inside a metal cylinder with an offset cylindrical hole. The magnetic field at any point in the cylinder is defined, and the field inside the hole is derived using superposition, leading to a specific expression. As the offset distance d approaches zero, the hole's axis aligns with the cylinder's center, resulting in a magnetic field of zero due to symmetry and cancellation effects. This indicates that the magnetic field inside the hole diminishes when it is centrally located. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of symmetry in determining the magnetic field behavior in this scenario.
oneofmany850
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Metal cylinder of radius a has the z-axis as its symmetry. It has magnetic field at any point P as: $$B[x,y,z] = \frac{1}{2} \mu_0 J_z [-ye_x + xe_y]$$

A cylindrical hole of radius b which is displaced from the cylinder's axis by d in the x direction. The magnetic field inside the hole is $$B = \frac{1}{2}\mu_0 J_z de_y$$

Does the field inside the hole make sense in the limit as d tends to zero? Explain why in 2 or 3 sentences.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Deriving the field in the hole from the field in the cylinder using superposition gave, $$B = \frac{1}{2} \mu_0 J_z [-ye_x +xe_y + ye_x - [x-d]e_y]$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So as d tends to zero the axis of the hole is moving to the centre of the cylinder and just leaves us with $$ B = \frac{1}{2} \mu_0 J_z$$? I'm not quite sure what the question is asking here. Any suggestions please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I think it shows that the magnetic field becomes zero in the hole when it is at the centre. Is this because of symmetry and cancelling?
 
oneofmany850 said:
Actually I think it shows that the magnetic field becomes zero in the hole when it is at the centre. Is this because of symmetry and cancelling?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes oneofmany850
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top