Magnetic Field Line Integral Problem

cjhseeker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the line integral of B between points i and f in the figure?

knight_Figure_32_22.jpg


Homework Equations



Ampere's Law: ∫B∙dl = Ienclosed * μ0
note: the integral on the left is a line integral.

The Attempt at a Solution



I applied Ampere's Law. I know that the contribution of B to the line integral on the straight segments to the left and right of the semicircle is zero since the magnetic field is perpendicular to the surface (line) at these segments. The semicircle, however, has a dl component that is parallel to the B field at all points along the semicircle. Therefore the integral should be B*pi*r (where r = 0.01 meters) and the right side of the equation should be 2A * μ0. I am confused as to whether the problem is asking for the value of the magnetic field, or whether I am supposed to simply give the value of ∫B∙dl.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They want the integral.
 
Remaining confusion about problem

pam said:
They want the integral.

In that case, the integral is equal to the current enclosed by the surface, multiplied by the constant (mu). Is the value of the current enclosed 2A or 1A? This is a bit unclear to me due to the nature of the Amperian surface. Thank you for helping.
 
The Amperian loop must be closed. Take it as a full circle for Ampere's law. Then, because of the symmetry, the integral on the half circle in the picture is half the full integral.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top