Magnetic field: the Banebridge velocity selector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass number of a singly charged Neon ion beam using the Banebridge velocity selector. The electric field intensity is 120 Volt/cm, and the magnetic field is 0.6 Weber/m². The calculated velocity of the beam is 20,000 m/sec, leading to a mass of 3.5 x 10^-25 kg. The resulting mass number is calculated to be 209, which is significantly higher than the expected value of 21. Participants express confusion over the discrepancy, suggesting a potential error in the textbook or translation used.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



The electric field intensity between the plates of the Banebridge velocity selector (I am not a native English speaker …) is 120 [Volt/cm] and the magnetic field magnitude of both fields is 0.6 [Weber/m2].
A singly charged Neon ion beam makes a radius of 7.28 [cm]. What is it's mass number.
The result must be 21, 10 times smaller than mine.

Homework Equations



Velocity of beam: V=\frac{E}{B}
radius of the beam: R[m]=\frac{mV}{qB}
mass number=mass/proton mass: N=\frac{m}{m_{p}}

The Attempt at a Solution



120[Volt/cm]=12,000[Volt/m]

V=\frac{E}{B}=\frac{12,000}{0.6}=20,000[m/sec]

R=0.728=\frac{mV}{qB}=\frac{m*20,000}{1.602\ \times\ 10^{-19}*0.6}\Rightarrow m=3.5\ \times\ 10^{-25}

N=\frac{m}{m_{p}}=\frac{3.5\ \times\ 10^{-25}}{1.672\ \times\ 10^{-27}}=209
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
what is your questions exactly?
 
My result is 10 times bigger, according to the book and the periodic table of elements, it should come out 20.9
 
I can't see what's wrong with your solution , it seems okay ..
 
Thanks for your effort, Ihope I'll get another answer before I decide there was a mistake in the book. By the way, it's taken from a translation to Sears & Zemansky, 1964...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top