Magnetic field using the Biot-Savart Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field at a specific point due to a small current element using the Biot-Savart Law. The current element is 2.0 mm long and carries a 2.0 A current in the +z direction. The calculated magnetic field magnitude is -9.6 pT in the +i direction, but the initial attempt at integration did not yield the correct result. Participants suggest considering the angle between the current element and the position vector, as well as ensuring the correct distance value is used in calculations. The importance of rigor in the integration process is also emphasized, particularly for small current elements in relation to their distance from the point of interest.
w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small current element at the origin has a length of 2.0mm and carries a current of 2.0A in the +z direction. Find the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field due to this current element at the point (0,3.0m,4.0m).


Homework Equations


Biot-Savart Law: dB=(mu/4pi)(Idl cross r(hat))/(r^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I attemped the problem by integrating the biot-savart law holding everything constant except for dl. However, this does not give me the correct answer, which by the way is -9.6pT in the +i direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show more detail of what you've done. It is impossible to guess what you did and where you went wrong.
 
I can't really show more work because I thought I only had to do a simple integration holding everything constant except for dl. But, I know that dl cross r hat will be in the negative i hat direction. In my equation, I am using 4pi*10^-7 for mu, 2A for I, .002m for l, and .05 for r. Do I need to take into account the dependence r has on the segment dl?
 
Do I need to take into account the dependence r has on the segment dl?

I don't think so in this case since the length of the current element is so small compared with the distance to your point of interest (although normally you would consider it). You could always try it both ways. Maybe your teacher wants you to do it the more rigorous way, though.

You have r=0.05, is that not supposed to be 5?

I think one thing you are missing is that there is an angle between dl and r hat (think cross product).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top