Magnetic Fields. Finding the angle of a moving charge.

zeldajae
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron is moving through a magnetic field whose magnitude is 8.70 X 10-4 T. The electron experiances only a magnetic force and has an acceleration of magnitude 3.50 X 1014 m/s2. At a certain instant, it has a speed of 6.80 X 106 m/s. Determine the angle \theta (less than 90o) between the electron's velocity and the magnetic field.

Homework Equations



F=ma

B = F / qo v (sin\theta)


The Attempt at a Solution



We know the mass of the electron= 1.673 X 10-27
So we plug that in the equation F=ma=(1.673 X 10-27)(3.5 X 1014 m/s2=5.86 X 10-13

Then we use the magnetic field equation and solve for sin\theta

sin\theta = F / q v B = (5.86 x 10-13)/((8.7 X 10-4)(6.8 X 106)(1.6 X 10-19)) = 618.608

That is wrong because the books answer is 19.7o. I know I am supposed to take inverse of the answer to find the angle. But I did my calculation correct and I am still getting the same answer...is there anything that I am doing wrong? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zeldajae said:
We know the mass of the electron= 1.673 X 10-27

Really?!:wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Really?!:wink:

Sorry, The mass of an electron is 9.1 X 10-31

After all the calculation, I get the right answer! Thanks for letting me know! I did a silly mistake!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top