Magnetic Fields from Two Infinite Sheets of Current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field integral from two infinite sheets of current positioned parallel to the y-z plane, with specific current values and wire densities. The initial approach incorrectly assumed the integral along a segment could be simplified using symmetry, which was pointed out as flawed due to differing magnetic field orientations. Participants suggest approximating the sheets as continuous current rather than focusing on individual wires, as their specific positions are not provided. The importance of carefully selecting closed loops for the integral is emphasized, and clarification is sought regarding the coordinates of points a, b, c, and d. The conversation highlights the complexity of integrating magnetic fields in this context.
pbstriker38
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Two infinite sheets of current flow parallel to the y-z plane as shown. The sheets are equally spaced from the origin by xo = 7.5 cm. Each sheet consists of an infinite array of wires with a density n = 19 wires/cm. Each wire in the left sheet carries a current I1 = 3.5 A in the negative z-direction. Each wire in the right sheet carries a current I2 = 3.2 A in the positive z-direction.

What is
\int^b_aB⃗⋅dl⃗
where the integral is taken along the dotted line shown, from a to b.




2. Homework Equations
B = uI
B = 1/2 unI




3. The Attempt at a Solution
I used half of \intB⃗⋅dl⃗ for the closed loop abcd. Which resulted in "It looks like you've assumed that the integral of B dot dl from a to b is equal to 1/2 of the integral B dot dl around the closed path (abcda). That would be true, for example, if B dot dl at all points along the segment ab were equal to B dot dl at all points along the segment cd. This is not true here. The magnetic field along segment ab is not equal to the magnetic field along segment cd. Further, the orientation of B and dl are different in these two segments, as well. To answer this question, you actually have to do the integral of B dot dl from a to b. "
 

Attachments

  • h15_sheets.png
    h15_sheets.png
    5 KB · Views: 1,305
Physics news on Phys.org
You used a wrong approach, and got a reply why it is wrong.

What is your question?

I think you are supposed to neglect the structure with the individual wires - their precise position is not given anyway. Just approximate the sheets as sheets with continuous current.
 
I don't know what they mean by "do the integral of B dot dl from a to b". What would be Ienclosed?
 
There is no enclosed current in that line.
You can use closed loops for the problem, but you have to choose them carefully.
 
What are the points a, b, c and d in terms of (x,y,z)?
 
I figured it out. It's just the y-component of B(p) * H
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top