Magnetic Flux Density vs Magnet Geometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of magnetic flux density between rectangular and arc-shaped N48 neodymium magnets of the same volume. The rectangular magnet has a magnetic flux density (Br) of 4010 gauss, but there is uncertainty about whether the arc magnet has the same gauss value. Participants highlight that calculating the B-field requires more than just volume; factors like shape and dimensions are crucial. There is a lack of available calculators for arc magnets, raising questions about the influence of magnet geometry on magnetic flux density. The consensus is that the shape of the magnet does affect the magnitude of the B-field.
Neferkamichael
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
2Magnets.jpg

Gentlemen, the the image shows 2 N48 neodymium magnets of the same volume 54 in2. On several website I can use magnetic flux density calculators to get the Br of the rectangular magnetic but haven't found one that calculates the value of the arc magnet. The Br value of the rectangular magnet is 4010 gauss. Is the gauss value of the arc magnet the same as the rectangular magnet? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean by gauss value, and I think to have the answer to the B-field from these magnets, we need to know more than just their volumes.
 
The unit of measure of the B field is guass or tesla. With a flux density calculator you plug in the length, width, and thickness, plus the relative permeability of the material you are using and the value returned is in gauss or tesla, the magnitude of the b field. I can't find any free calculators that will calculate the magnitude of the b field of an arc magnet. I was wondering if anybody knows if the shape of the magnet is important in determining the magnitude of the b field or if 2 magnets of different shapes but the same volume would have the same magnitude.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top