Magnetic flux of magnetic field changing as a function of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of magnetic flux as a function of time, represented by the equation B(t) = B0(t^2/T^2) for 0 ≤ t ≤ T. The user is uncertain about the correct approach to find the current after determining the flux and considers whether to integrate or change variables. It is noted that the bar is moving at a constant velocity, which is crucial for applying Newton's second law in this context. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify the relationship between velocity, time, and space in the calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the conceptual challenges in linking magnetic flux to current in a dynamic system.
besebenomo
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
There is a circuit with resistance R, a moving bar of lenght l moves at constant velocity v=l/T and at t=0 the bar is in position x=0. In the beginning the circuit is in a region where B=0, the the bar starts moving into a region with a non-zero magnetic field (see figure), which varies with time.

What is the current flowing in the circuit?
Relevant Equations
Magnetic flux, Faraday's law
$$B(t) = B_{0} \frac{t^2}{T^2}$$

for ##0 \leq t \leq T##

sda.png

The issue here is more conceptual, because once I find the flux of B I know how to proceed to find the current. I got velocity (but it seems to me that it is the initial velocity), I could use it to find the time in function of space, but not sure if that is correct...

Instead I tried this way:
$$\Phi(B) = B_{0}\frac{t^2}{T^2} x(t)l$$
Should I integrate instead? And change variable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
besebenomo said:
The issue here is more conceptual, because once I find the flux of B I know how to proceed to find the current. I got velocity (but it seems to me that it is the initial velocity), I could use it to find the time in function of space, but not sure if that is correct...

Instead I tried this way:
$$\Phi(B) = B_{0}\frac{t^2}{T^2} x(t)l$$
Should I integrate instead? And change variable?
You have the flux and it is what you say. Since you say you know how to proceed to find the current, do it and show your work. One piece of information you need to bring into the picture is that the bar is moving at constant velocity. What does that mean? Hint: You need to write Newton's second law just like in the other thread.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top