Magnetic flux of rectangular loop w/ wire

Vapor88
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the magnetic flux of the rectangular loop. Show that \int B x dl is independent of path by calculating \oint B x dl

loop.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First step was to solve for B from the wire, I did that using Biot-Savart Law for a straight wire.

B = \frac{ \mu_{o}I}{2 \pi s}

To get flux use

\Phi = \int B \bullet da = \int ^{b}_{a} \frac{ \mu_{o} I}{2 \pi s} w ds = \frac{ \mu_{o} I w}{2 \pi} ln ( \frac{b}{a})

So far so good?

Okay, now I can show that it's independent of path by doing a line integral.

Here's where I'm sketchy.

I need to use \oint B \! x \! dl

So I need to evaluate an integral over each side of the loop. The value is going to be dependent on distance from the straight wire. Now, B is coming out of the board. The magnitude of this will be the same on the left as it is on the right, but because it's a cross product, they'll cancel each other out. Then, right hand rule shows that evaluating the top segment's integral yields something that points toward the wire, and the bottom one points up. We'll say up is in the \widehat{s} direction. So they won't cancel each other out, but I'm forgetting how to do this...

B_{top} = \frac{ \mu_{o}I}{2 \pi b}

B_{bottom} = \frac{ \mu_{o}I}{2 \pi a}

So now I'm confused, do I have to integrate these? I would think that the only things that I had to integrate were the sides, because B changes for them as they get further from the straight wire.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since B is constant along the top of the wire, you will just integrate along dx. Since the length is 'w', then the integral will just be 'w'.

For cross product please use the "\times" (\times) latex command.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top