Magnetic moment and magnetic torque of a current loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the magnetic moment of a current loop, specifically addressing its definition and the implications of external magnetic fields. The magnetic moment (mu) is defined as "mu = S I," where S is the surface area enclosed by the loop and I is the current. It is clarified that the magnetic moment is not limited to the center of the loop; rather, it represents the entire object and can be visualized at the center of mass for simplicity. Torque (tau) is influenced by the number of magnetic field lines passing through the loop, regardless of whether they intersect at the center. This understanding emphasizes that magnetic moment and torque are properties of the entire current loop system, not just specific points within it.
Gavo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi.
I have a question concerning the magnetic momentum of a current loop.
We know that if we have a circular current loop (a solenoid with N=1), there is a magnetic moment (mu) in the center of the loop given by "mu=S I" (I=current, S =surface enclosed by the loop). So, if there is an external magnetic field B, we can have a torque (tau) given by "tau=mu x B".
In order to calculate this, we need to have a magnetic field with its field lines passing through the center of the surface enclosed by the loop.
What happens when we have a magnetic field with lines passing thruogh the surface of current loop, but not in the center? Would it be any torque? I guess these questions are linked to the fact that the magnetic momentum "mu" of a current loop is defined only in the center of the surface enclosed by the loop (or not?).

Thanks to everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic moment is not "defined only in the center of the loop". The magnetic moment is not a field, it is a single entity attached to a single object. We draw it in the center because that is the center of action, but it describes the entire object. Think of the force on gravity on a donut. The force that the donut feels is a single entity describing the entire object. Because it is a single entity, we only draw one vector arrow. You've got to draw the arrow, somewhere, so you draw it attached to the center of mass because that is the center of action. But for a donut, there is no matter at its center, so is there a problem if we draw the force vector acting on a spot with no matter? No, this is not a problem because the force is not a field. It acts on objects, not on single points in space. So the vector drawn attached to the hole in the middle of the donut is understood to represent the total effect of gravity exerting a force on the entire donut, as if its entire mass where contained at a point which is its center of mass.
It is the same with magnetic moment, electric dipole moment, angular momentum, velocity, etc. They are single-entity vectors which only make sense when attached and describing an object (or system of objects).

For the torque law you describe, it's the number of field lines passing through anywhere in the loop that have an effect. That is why mu is dependent on the S, the entire surface area enclosed by the loop.
 
Ok, thanks a lot, now it's clear.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top