Magnetic Susceptibility (Ferromagnetic)

sombrancelha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Near the critical point, Gibbs free energy of a ferromagnetic system can be written as (1).
a)Using the definition of magnetization, (2), show that

m(t,H=0) = Bt^{\beta}

B is a constant. Determine \beta in relation to \alpha and \Delta

b) Show that the susceptibility when H = 0 can be written as

\chi (t, H=0) = Ct^{-\gamma}

in which C is a constant. What is the relation between \gamma, \alpha and \Delta?

Homework Equations


(1) \text{ } g(t,H) = t^{2-\alpha}F\left(\frac{T}{t^{\Delta}}\right)

(2 ) m (t,H) = - \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial H}\right)_T

t = (T - Tc)/Tc
T = Temperature
Tc = critical temperature
H = magnetic field
F(x) is a function
g is gibbs free energy

The Attempt at a Solution


I've done item a, but I do not know what is the definition for the susceptibility of a ferromagnetic system.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there, I am taking a grad level statmech course right now. The definition of magnetic susceptibility, regardless of the type of interaction (ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic), is dm/dH.

Above, m is the magnetization and H is the magnetic field.

Hope that helps!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top