Magnetism of Hematite Cylinders: Laser Carving & Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdnyisaac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
Using a laser to carve a magnetized hematite cylinder should not disrupt its magnetic poles, provided the material is kept cool during the process. The hematite is expected to retain its magnetism after being carved, resulting in both the smaller cylinder and the ring maintaining their magnetic properties. Concerns about heat affecting magnetism are valid, as overheating could lead to a loss of magnetization. Therefore, careful temperature management is crucial when using a laser on hematite. Overall, laser carving can be safely performed without losing the magnetism if proper precautions are taken.
rdnyisaac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Scenario:
You have a small, magnetized, cylinder-shaped hematite. The positive pole is on top and the negative pole is on the bottom. You took a laser to carve a new, smaller cylinder. After you're done carving, you are left with a smaller cylinder and a ring.

Here are my questions:

Will the laser mess with the poles?

If it doesn't mess with the poles, what would happen it you pickup the small cylinder now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the hematite isn't heated past a certain point it should retain it's magnetism after being carved. Both the cylinder and ring should still be magnetic with the poles aligned in the same direction.
 
Would it be possibly safe to use a laser without the magnetism being lost?
 
rdnyisaac said:
Would it be possibly safe to use a laser without the magnetism being lost?

I don't know enough about using lasers to answer that. I would think that as long as you kept the hematite cool you would be fine.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top