Magnetized Toroid Problem 6.10 - Griffiths EM

  • Thread starter Thread starter buhthestuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Toroid
buhthestuh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I needed some help with a problem from the Griffiths Book on EM. It's problem number 6.10 if anyone has the book. Here is the problem and I have attached a crude drawing using MSPaint.

An iron rod of length L and square cross section (side a), is given a uniform longitudinal magnetization M, and then bent around into a circle with a narrow gap (width w). Find the magnetic field at the center of the gap, assuming w << a << L. [Hint: treat it as the superposition of a complete torus plus a square loop with reversed current.]

The field inside a toroid is: B= \frac{\mu_0 NI}{2\pi s}. The hint would lead me to believe that I can take NI -> M. The field at the center of the gap due to a loop of current in the opposite direction would be:B=-\frac{2\sqrt{2}\mu_0 I}{\pi a}.

This means the answer would be:
B=\frac{\mu_0 NI}{L} - \frac{2\sqrt{2}\mu_0 I}{\pi a}.

However I don't see how to resolve the current(I) in this problem. Is there a way to relate M and I or am I going about this problem in the completely wrong direction.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
buhthestuh said:
The field inside a toroid is: B= \frac{\mu_0 NI}{2\pi s}. The hint would lead me to believe that I can take NI -> M.
Not quite. NI would be the TOTAL current in the toroid. You've probably figured out the bound surface current is K_b=M. So knowing you have this bound surface currentm you can solve for the total current and equate that NI.
 
Ok it seems then that the field should be

B = \frac{\mu_0 M}{L} - \frac{2\sqrt{2}\mu_0 Mw}{\pi a}<br />

or

<br /> B = \mu_0 M \left[ \frac{1}{L} - \frac{2\sqrt{2}w}{\pi a} \right]<br />

However since L >> a and 2\sqrt{2}w &gt;&gt; 1 the field would be negative. But that seems proposterous considering that w is just a minute width compared to the whole of the toroid.
 
Last edited:
That ain't right. How'd you get the L? The field shouldn't depend on L. (It also doesn't add up unit wise).

For the whole loop the total current is K_b(2\pi s) so B=\mu_0M.
The rest is all ok.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top