Magnetostatics Proof: Proving Integral Along a Closed Loop = 0

rocket
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a physics problem, and i got stuck on an integral. the entire question is as follows:

----------------------------
Magnetostatics treats the "source current" (the one that sets up the field) and
the "recipient current" (the one that experiences the force) so asymmetrically that it is by no means obvious that the magnetic force between two current loops is consistent with Newton"s third law. Show, starting with the Biot-Savart law and the Lorentz force law, that the force on loop 2 due to loop 1 can be written as

F2 = -\frac{\mu_o}{4\pi}I_1 I_2 \oint_1 \oint_2 \frac{\widehat{r}}{r^2} d\overrightarrow{l_1} \cdot d\overrightarrow{l_2}

In this form it is clear that F2 = — F1, since i changes direction when the roles of 1 and 2 are interchanged. (If you seem to be getting an "extra" term, it will help to note that d\overrightarrow{l_2} \cdot \widehat{r} = dr.)
--------------------------------------


I'm okay with most of the proof - just a specific part I'm stuck on. i got to the part where i have
F2 = \frac{\mu_o}{4\pi}I_1 I_2 [\oint_1 \oint_2 \frac{d\overrightarrow{l_1} dr}{r^2} - \oint_1 \oint_2 \frac{\widehat{r}}{r^2} d\overrightarrow{l_1} \cdot d\overrightarrow{l_2}]

i want to prove that the first integral is zero, so i need to show that this integral along a closed loop:

\oint_2 (1/r^2) dr

is equal to zero. but I'm not sure how to prove it. i was wondering if someone can show me a rigid proof for this. Note that the integral is along loop 2. Note also that the \overrightarrow{r} is the distance from a point on loop 1 to a point on loop 2 - that is, \overrightarrow {r} = (x2-x1, y2-y1, z2-z1), so in the integral above, where r is a scalar, then r = [(x2-x1, y2-y1, z2-z1)]^{1/2}. I'm not sure how to rewrite dr in terms of x2, since r is a scaler. should it be dr = dxdydz? I think I'm missing something here because I'm not really that familiar with loop integrals.
 

Attachments

  • 5.62.jpeg
    5.62.jpeg
    7.6 KB · Views: 525
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
{\bf\hat r}/r^3 is wrong.
It should be \frac{\bf(r_2-r_1)}{{\bf|r_2-r_1|}^3}.
Then the first integral becomes dl dot a gradient which integrates to zero.
This problem is worked out in several tetbooks.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top