- #1
Dash-IQ
- 108
- 1
Is it possible to maintain, the same current when there is induced back-EMF(that is supposed to reduce it)? I assumed at the cost of more input electrical power it could be done. Am I correct? If I am how can this be done?
The most direct way of keeping current at some fixed level is to power the circuit via a constant-current source, a circuit that can adjust the voltage to cause current to stay constant. For a more specific answer, you will have to provide the schematic of the circuit you are involved with.Dash-IQ said:Is it possible to maintain, the same current when there is induced back-EMF(that is supposed to reduce it)? I assumed at the cost of more input electrical power it could be done. Am I correct? If I am how can this be done?
NascentOxygen said:The most direct way of keeping current at some fixed level is to power the circuit via a constant-current source, a circuit that can adjust the voltage to cause current to stay constant. For a more specific answer, you will have to provide the schematic of the circuit you are involved with.
An electronic circuit can be constructed to achieve almost anything you desire.Dash-IQ said:Knowing that the principle is possible, is the most important to me. I assumed such an idea would be impossible to maintain the same current while back-emf is induced.
Dash-IQ said:Is it possible to maintain, the same current when there is induced back-EMF(that is supposed to reduce it)? I assumed at the cost of more input electrical power it could be done. Am I correct? If I am how can this be done?
Baluncore said:Back EMF suggests that V becomes negative. For that to occur, the current must be falling with time, di/dt is negative.
If you want to turn off the current quickly, then it pays to install a dump resistor in series with the flyback diode. That allows more back EMF, a larger di/dt, so less time. The possibilities are limited by the voltage rating of the switch.sophiecentaur said:It doesn't surprise me that a beefy inductor can take out a weedy bit of silicon. dI/dy can be very high if you aren't careful. A relay coil can cause havock if you don't use a catching diode.
My experience is that you must prevent a damaging back EMF from destroying the switch. The joules should preferably go somewhere else, such as the source if it is rechargeable, or a resistive dump load.jim hardy said:your design must allow for return of energy to the source.
sophiecentaur said:If it is a constant source, its output volts will increase (to 17V) to force 1A through the device, against your back emf. If the power supply cannot do this then it is not a content current source. It may be a 'Current Limiting Source', like many commercial power supplies and there can be confusion here..
Dash-IQ said:Hows fast is this process? Of stabilizing current with the presences of back-emf?
Dash-IQ said:Im sorry for creating a confusing matter, I didn't attach a diagram because this is more of a general problem.
I wanted to know how to deal with back-emf that's induced by the change in magnetic flux. I wanted to know if it was ever possible to maintain the same current where there is change in the flux(and back-emf is induced).
@sophiecentaur, and @NascentOxygen perfectly answered that general question for me.
I thank the rest for all for their contributions, I don't think I need to attach a diagram and go on with this subject, because what I understood is there is indeed a way to maintain the same current even when back-emf is induced.
NascentOxygen said:What will we observe if current is held fixed but L is made to vary with time? This could be achieved by tap-changing, or by partly withdrawing the solenoid's core.
Dash-IQ said:Still the principle applies, that we can maintain the same current by supplying more source-emf, and what Kirchoff answered is perfect for a "general question" that I believe fits for all cases.
sophiecentaur said:If it is a constant source, its output volts will increase (to 17V) to force 1A through the device, against your back emf. If the power supply cannot do this then it is not a content current source. It may be a 'Current Limiting Source', like many commercial power supplies and there can be confusion here..
Dash-IQ said:sophiecentaur, the total voltage in the circuit would be...? 17V, or 12V?
How is the voltage increased? By using resistors? Wouldn't that change the current at 12V if it we're 12V. Something about PD's basics that I struggle with at times.
We have a circuit that's total resistance is 1 Ohm, and V = 5V, I = 5A, P = 10W
sophiecentaur said:I think you need to look at this another way - you seem to be putting the cart before the horse.
First, just assume that an actual current source exists. This will (by definition) put the required current through your Inductor (plus its resistance). What Volts are you going to measure across this Inductor? Answer: I(R+jL).
Now all you need to do , to achieve this in practice, is to provide those volts from some other (real circuit), which can be just a very high resistance in series with a high voltage source OR it can involve a supply that will maintain the wanted current by (possibly) varying volts somewhere, by means of a control loop. As the replacement circuit is producing exactly the correct current, the volts will be just what you measured in the original experiment with an ideal source.
There is a small matter of Phase / time lag to be considered here if you want to analyse it completely.
BTW, you keep referring to a steady current - you do mean AC? That's not very good for a electromagnet. Could you make it clearer for me?
Remember that there will be a phase between AC current and voltage waveforms so you need to consider the VA as well as the Watts if you now are wanting to look at the Power situation. This is how Power Factor affects the use of reactive loads.
Of course you will need to change the supply volts if you change the coil resistance but when the current is what you want, the back emf will be the same (unless you are changing the inductance too). Phase will be different again.
davenn said:25W
Dash-IQ said:This is VERY interesting, providing voltage from another real circuit, that's beyond me!
I know it's difficult to say without any details, but the time lag... is in the rage of seconds or milliseconds normally?
Btw, I always confuse terms... this whole circuits is a DC circuit.
sophiecentaur said:If it's a DC circuit, where is any back emf coming from?