Majorana Particle Discovery: Princeton Researchers Report Direct Observation

AI Thread Summary
Princeton researchers have reported the direct observation of Majorana particles, but the clarity of the reporting has raised skepticism about its validity. Critics point out inaccuracies, such as claims of temperatures below absolute zero, which undermine the credibility of the article. The discussion clarifies that what is being referred to are quasiparticles, not fundamental particles, as Majorana fermions are expected to localize at the edges of topological superconductors. The researchers used ferromagnetic iron atomic chains on superconducting lead to demonstrate the formation of a topological phase and edge-bound Majorana fermions. Overall, the initial article appears to lack rigor and proper scientific context.
jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
http://thewestsidestory.net/2014/10/05/18346/obscure-majorna-particle-discovered-encompasses-matter-antimatter/

Reports the direct observation of Majorana particles, by Princeton researchers. Is there anything substantive to this? - or is it just a Science writer getting it wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
On first glance, it appears to be a science writer getting it wrong. He says they lower the metals to below absolute zero, and the clarity of the article isn't very large. It makes me suspicious.
 
I have no idea if the research being discussed it valid or not, but certainly the article is terrible.

It is highly unstable and due to its very tough and hard properties
I have no idea what "tough" and "hard" properties are and I doubt the writer does either. I suppose he's trying to emphasize complicated.

The temperature of the set up was decreased significantly, even lower than that of absolute zero temperature i.e. -273 degree Celsius.
This is where I stopped reading.
 
TumblingDice said:
Wow! A writer who can't read,
I think it's more a case of a writer who can't THINK.
 
Obviously, if this is happening in iron, it's not a fundamental particle. If you read better articles, you will see that this is a quasiparticle: a type of crystal defect that can be treated using the same mathematics as in field theory.
 
Article at sciencemag.org

They are clearly referring to quasiparticles. Abstract:
Majorana fermions are predicted to localize at the edge of a topological superconductor, a state of matter that can form when a ferromagnetic system is placed in proximity to a conventional superconductor with strong spin-orbit interaction. With the goal of realizing a one-dimensional topological superconductor, we have fabricated ferromagnetic iron (Fe) atomic chains on the surface of superconducting lead (Pb). Using high-resolution spectroscopic imaging techniques, we show that the onset of superconductivity, which gaps the electronic density of states in the bulk of the Fe chains, is accompanied by the appearance of zero energy end states. This spatially resolved signature provides strong evidence, corroborated by other observations, for the formation of a topological phase and edge-bound Majorana fermions in our atomic chains.
 
The same thing happens in Biology articles from the mainstream press. It seemed awful from the get-go, but there were no citations to get me further down the road. Did a Google search and found nothing.

Thanks for the input. And the links.
 
Back
Top