Make a Brushless DC Motor this way?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of constructing a brushless DC motor using a round plastic sleeve and magnets to create a circular magnetic field around a wire. While the concept suggests that a constant net force on the magnets would generate continuous torque, concerns arise regarding the lack of changing magnetic flux as the motor spins, which would prevent back EMF and potentially lead to infinite speed. It is noted that BLDC motors require a sequenced AC drive current, and using DC would not provide the necessary changes in magnetic field to sustain motion. Additionally, coiling the wire could enhance efficiency by concentrating the magnetic field. Ultimately, the design may not function as intended due to these fundamental electromagnetic principles.
hodges
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I know the magnetic field makes a circle around a wire with current flowing through it. So I wondered if a motor could be made in the following way. Take a round plastic sleeve with an inner diameter slightly more than the wire. Glue 4 magnets on the sleeve, such that they form a circular magnetic field (for example, the north pole of each magnet could always face to the right when looking down at the vertical sleeve from above). Now run the wire through the sleeve and allow current to flow. It seems to me that there will always be a constant net force on each magnet, resulting in a constant torque to spin the motor.

But some things don't seem right about this. As the motor spins, it appears to me that the magnetic flux experienced by the wire is not changing. Thus, there will be no back EMF generated to limit the speed of the motor. So the motor could reach infinite speed (neglecting friction). For the same reason, the device could not be used as a generator, which seems strange from a symmetry perspective.

What is wrong with my idea? I know from a practical standpoint the current in the wire would have to be high, since there is only a single wire involved vs. the multiple turns in a conventional motor. But in theory, would this device work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BLDC motors require a sequenced (basically AC) drive current, so I think you have designed a motor that will work with AC current. With DC there will be no change in magnetic field, so nothing to push the magnets after they line up with the first ON-pulse. Coiling the wire to concentrate the magnetic field will make a more efficient use of the current flow. Spinning the magnets will produce an AC current, not DC...
 
schip666! said:
BLDC motors require a sequenced (basically AC) drive current, so I think you have designed a motor that will work with AC current. With DC there will be no change in magnetic field, so nothing to push the magnets after they line up with the first ON-pulse. Coiling the wire to concentrate the magnetic field will make a more efficient use of the current flow. Spinning the magnets will produce an AC current, not DC...

Won't there be a constant force on each of the magnets (force on a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field)?
 
I believe the field from a DC current in the wire is "polarized" in a fixed direction ...the right-hand twist rule or something like that... The magnets will line up with that direction to remain in balance. If you change the field strength, or better reverse it, then you get the magnets to move.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top