Making a Simple Circuit with MOC3041 Optoisolator and BTA24 Triac

  • Thread starter Thread starter pierce15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a simple circuit using the MOC3041 optoisolator and BTA24 triac, with several technical questions raised about their operation. The optoisolator is intended to control the triac, allowing it to conduct when the LED is activated, while the triac remains latched until the current drops to zero. Participants clarify that the resistor and capacitor values are crucial for managing voltage slew rates and preventing false triggering. There are concerns about the measured forward voltage of the MOC3041 LED being lower than expected, which may indicate a problem with the component. Proper testing procedures are emphasized, including the need for isolation when measuring voltages in AC circuits.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
I am making a very simple circuit, shown below (from the MOC3041 datasheet). The circuit consists of a MOC3041 optoisolator driving a BTA24 triac (click either for datasheet). I have a number of short questions and don't think it makes sense to make a separate thread, so I'll just put them all here.

1. First, I don't really understand what the optoisolator is supposed to do. When a current flows through 1 and 2, is there supposed to be a constant voltage between 4 and 6?

2. How the values of the resistors and capacitor are chosen. (Also I am using 120 Vac). Should these values depend on the properties of my triac/the output of the MOC3041? I understand the reason why the 39 ohm resistor and the cap are there, since they form an RLC circuit if the load is inductive and hence can dissipate power if the load is switched off. Are these just standard values?

3. Can someone give me a simple explanation of how to operate a triac? I have tried reading a number of explanations and am unable to understand them. My current understanding is this: if there is a voltage at the gate above a certain threshold (called ## V _\text{GT}## in the datasheet) and a sufficient current flows through either other terminal (##I_\text{GT})##, then the triac will conduct across the main terminals in either direction. Is that right?

upload_2017-3-10_3-36-3.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When current flows through the LED (pins 1 and 2) the resistance between pins 4 and 6 becomes very low which then causes a current in the TRIAC gate circuit, so the TRIAC is triggered and turns on. When the LED turns off, the TRIAC remains latched in the conducting state until the current falls to zero. Then it stays off until the LED is turned on again.

There is no inductive kick when the TRIAC turns off because that can only happen as the current reverses through zero.

The 39R and 0u01F limit the voltage slew rate across the TRIAC so as to prevent triggering by noise on the supply.

The 330R makes sure that the TRIAC will turn off when there is no LED current, and prevents false triggering.

The 360R protects the optoisolator from a high current spike during the turn on transient.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
The long time ago I drew this diagram. And it fits to the description given by Baluncore.
96.png
 
Thanks to both of you for the help. So just to clarify: there should be no voltage drop across the detector pins when there is a current through the MOC3041 LED pins, right? And it should be able to conduct either way?

I tested the below circuit with just the BTA24 (so no optoisolator) and it worked with a 100 ohm resistor, since 100 ohms ## \approx## (120 V - 1.3 V) / (.035 A). But when I use the same resistor value in the place of the 360 ohm resistor in the first diagram, it doesn't work. My understanding is that the circuit should be exactly the same except the switch SW1 becomes pins 4 and 6 of he MOC3041. Let me know if this is wrong. If it is right, can you think of a simple test to see if the MOC3041 is broken? I measured the voltage/current through the MOC3041 LED and it is above the threshold current at 35 mA. However, the forward voltage is at only .7 V whereas the datasheet says it should be at 1.3 V. Does that sound strange?

upload_2017-3-10_14-53-3.png
 
Last edited:
pierce15 said:
So just to clarify: there should be no voltage drop across the diac detector pins when there is a current through the MOC3041 LED pins, right? And it should be able to conduct either way?
There will be some voltage across the MOC3041 output pins when conducting. It will only be +/– 5 volts.
Yes, it should conduct either way. See; Figure 1. “On–State Characteristics” on page 2 of the data sheet.

The MOC3041 is drawn as having a low power TRIAC output stage. There may be a DIAC in the zero-crossing turn on circuit.

In your test circuit, post #4 you do not have an RC series snubber across the triac. You also do not show a resistor between triac G and MT1 to mop up any charge at the triac gate. That may make reliable testing difficult.

The IR LED voltage should be between 1 and 2 volts when conducting, with pin 1 more positive than pin 2. If you reverse bias the LED you may see a protection diode voltage drop of close to 0.7 volt, but I doubt that is provided since the usual LED Vr = 6V reverse breakdown voltage is included in the data sheet.

Take care how you measure voltages in the AC power circuit. You should have an isolation transformer for the testing you are doing. A digital multimeter will not be a good solution because it will give silly answers in switching AC circuits. Use a moving coil meter with a range switch.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top