Calculating Velocity from Conservation of Momentum: A Science Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndrewMorris
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using conservation of momentum to calculate velocity, with a specific example yielding a velocity of 2.86 m/s. The original calculation appears correct, but a participant suggests double-checking the number 400 for potential errors. They recommend using symbolic calculations and maintaining consistent units to avoid mistakes. Acknowledgment of common errors in math is shared, emphasizing that such mistakes can happen to anyone. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculation and verification in physics problems.
AndrewMorris
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
My daughter was asked this question:
A person of mass 60 kg running at 8 m/s reaches a wagon of mass 80 kg going at 2 m/s and jumps onto it. Calculate the velocity of the wagon immediately after the person jumps on.
Relevant Equations
total momentum before impact = total momentum after impact
Using conservation of momentum I would say (60 x 8) + (80 x 2) = (60 + 80) v
so v = 400/140 = 2.86 m/s.
However, this is not one of the multiple choice responses. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setup looks right. But check the number 400.
 
Apart from that, consider using symbolic calculations and only insert your numbers at the end. It often avoids this kind of mistakes. Or at least use units throughout.
 
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
 
AndrewMorris said:
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
It was just a careless error. Happens to us all :oldsmile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top