Manipulating inverse square graph into straight line graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around manipulating the inverse square relationship of force between two charged spheres into a linear graph format. The experiment shows that the force of repulsion decreases by a factor of 1/4 when the distance is doubled, resulting in a concave graph. To achieve a straight line graph, the user needs to plot force against 1/r^2, aligning with the linear equation format y = mx + c. The confusion arises from understanding how to express the force equation in this linear form. Ultimately, the key takeaway is to plot force as a function of 1/r^2 to create a straight line graph.
sync303
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the course of performing several trials I determined that if you have 2 charged metal spheres (with the same amount of charge on them) and they are both positively charged, then the force of repulsion between them is changed by 1/4 each time you double the distance between them.

This experiment no doubt sounds very familiar as it has been done many times before.

I collected my data (16N@1.0cm, 4N@2.0cm, 1N@4.0cm, and 0.25N@8.0cm) and graphed it and of course I end up with a classic looking descending, concave looking graph which is the inverse square graph, I think.

Homework Equations



Now I have been puzzling over this for quite a while and even asked my boss and some co-workers to help and even together we can not figure it out - the question is:

"manipulate the data so that the graph is a straight line graph"

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried doubling the charge, halving the distance, square rooting the distance, etc.

It always seems to end up with the same shape.

I think I might be missing the fundamental lesson here. Hopefully someone here can offer some insight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a relationship that is force = some_factor/distance^2
And a straight line is y=mx + c

So you need to put it into this form.
y (ie. force) = m x (ie. 1/r^2 )
 
mgb_phys said:
You have a relationship that is force = some_factor/distance^2
And a straight line is y=mx + c

So you need to put it into this form.
y (ie. force) = m x (ie. 1/r^2 )

Thank you very much - I knew it was something fundamental.

I have been out of school for several years and am taking a course to upgrade and the formula for the graph of a line is something I have completely forgotten!

So I need to manipulate my F=kq/r^2 into a form that matches y=mx + c?

I will make an attempt to do so.
 
sync303 said:
So I need to manipulate my F=kq/r^2 into a form that matches y=mx + c?
Yes just plot force against 1/r^2
 
mgb_phys said:
Yes just plot force against 1/r^2

Ok, I am still struggling with this.

If i used y=mx or in this case F=m(1/r^2) I am going to get the same answers am I not?

I can't see the difference between F=m/r^2 and F=m(1/r^2) where m is equal to kq.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top