- #1
mysearch
Gold Member
- 526
- 0
Hi,
I am trying to understand some of the basics of differential geometry in respect to general relativity. However, I not sure that I understand what seems to be a fairly fundamental bit of maths connected with the generic metric given in [1]. For simplicity, the notation has been reduced to 2-dimensional (x,y) coordinates:
[1] [tex]ds^2=g_{xy} dx^x dx^y[/tex]
While I understand the geometry by which the separation (ds) can be expanded to the form in [2], I am unsure how matrix multiplication explains this process.
[2] [tex]ds^2 = g_{11} xx + g_{12} xy + g_{21} yx +g_{22} yy [/tex]
In the simplest case, [2] collapses to Pythagoras via the values assigned to (g). For example, in 2D space, I was assuming (g=1,0,0,1) to be a 2x2 matrix, while (dx dy) might be described as 2x1 matrices that represent the component vectors of (ds) along the orthogonal axes (x,y), e.g.(x=3,0) and (y=0,4).
[3] [tex]ds^2 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&1\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{cc}3\\0\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{cc}0\\4\end{array}\right) [/tex]
While this logic, which is likely to be flawed, leads to the form in [3], I am not sure how multiplying the three matrices with the dimensions above leads to the form suggested by [2]. Therefore, I would much appreciate any clarification on offer. Thanks
I am trying to understand some of the basics of differential geometry in respect to general relativity. However, I not sure that I understand what seems to be a fairly fundamental bit of maths connected with the generic metric given in [1]. For simplicity, the notation has been reduced to 2-dimensional (x,y) coordinates:
[1] [tex]ds^2=g_{xy} dx^x dx^y[/tex]
While I understand the geometry by which the separation (ds) can be expanded to the form in [2], I am unsure how matrix multiplication explains this process.
[2] [tex]ds^2 = g_{11} xx + g_{12} xy + g_{21} yx +g_{22} yy [/tex]
In the simplest case, [2] collapses to Pythagoras via the values assigned to (g). For example, in 2D space, I was assuming (g=1,0,0,1) to be a 2x2 matrix, while (dx dy) might be described as 2x1 matrices that represent the component vectors of (ds) along the orthogonal axes (x,y), e.g.(x=3,0) and (y=0,4).
[3] [tex]ds^2 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&1\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{cc}3\\0\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{cc}0\\4\end{array}\right) [/tex]
While this logic, which is likely to be flawed, leads to the form in [3], I am not sure how multiplying the three matrices with the dimensions above leads to the form suggested by [2]. Therefore, I would much appreciate any clarification on offer. Thanks