Manipulation of Electromagnetic fields using curls clarification

gedanken6
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question 1. General Plane Waves.
We may represent a general electromagnetic plane wave by (real part of the complex exponentials)
E=E_{0}*e^(i*<b>k</b>*<b>r</b>-iwt) B=B_{0}*e^(i*<b>k</b>*<b>r</b>-iwt)

Show that Faraday's Law becomes iwB0=-ik x Eo

Homework Equations



dB/dt=- curl of E

The Attempt at a Solution


I transformed dB/dt into iwB0e^(ikr-iwt).

Attempted to perform curl of E on Eoe^(ikr-iwt) but not sure how to work with the r. I thought you might use curl in spherical polars but then you have theta and phi components and I think there's only x, y and z
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gedanken6! :smile:
gedanken6 said:
E=E_{0}*e^(i*<b>k</b>*<b>r</b>-iwt) B=B_{0}*e^(i*<b>k</b>*<b>r</b>-iwt)

… not sure how to work with the r. I thought you might use curl in spherical polars …

just because there's an r, that doesn't mean it stands for "radius"!

k*r simply means kxi + kyj + kzk :wink:

(erm … different k)
 
No, it's the dot product:
\vec{k}\cdot \vec{r}=k_x x+k_y y+k_z z.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
oops! :redface:

thanks, vanhees71! :smile:
 
Start with faraday's law, use Stokes' theorem to produce Maxwell's law for del x E, then just use the given plane wave equations to show the validity of the given relationship between E0 and B0, which is just a matter of some differential calculus.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top