Mapping unit circle from one complex plane to another

sr3056
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I want to show that if the complex variables ζ and z and related via the relation

z = (2/ζ) + ζ

then the unit circle mod(ζ) = 1 in the ζ plane maps to an ellipse in the z-plane.

Then if I write z as x + iy, what is the equation for this ellipse in terms of x and y?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Then if I write z as x + iy, what is the equation for this ellipse in terms of x and y?
... you mean: "how should I go about finding the equation of the ellipse?" Nobody is going to spoon-feed you the actual answer here - but we can help you find it for yourself.

You can help us do that by attempting the problem.

Start out by writing out the relations you know:

1. z = (2/ζ) + ζ
2. |ζ| = 1

3. ζ = γ + iλ
4. z = x + iy

5. ... any other relations that must hold true?

Presumably you can expand 1 and 2 in terms of 3?
Presumably you can look up the general equation of an ellipse?

Now where do you get stuck?
 
I think I've got it now..

Let ζ = u+iv so u²+v²=1 because |ζ| = 1

2/ζ + ζ = 2 / (u+iv) + (u+iv) = 2(u−iv) / (u²+v²) + (u+iv) = 3u−iv

∴ x+iy = 3u−iv and so u=x/3, v=−y

From u²+v² = 1 this yields (x/3)²+y² = 1, an ellipse

Thanks for your help
 
No worries :-)
Sometimes the trick is starting without knowing whe re you are going.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top