Markovian Master Equation and Uncorrelated States

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kreizhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Master States
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In deriving the Markovian master equation for a weakly coupled system+environment scensario, we have
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} P \rho(t) = \alpha^2 \int_{t_0}^t P L(t) L(s) P \rho(s) ds
where \alpha is the coupling strenght, P\rho = \left( \mathrm{Tr} \rho \right) \otimes \rho_B for \rho_B the initial environment state, Q\rho = (\mathcal I - P ) \rho for \mathcal I the identity superoperator, and L the Liouvillian of the system satisfying L(t)\rho = -i[H_I(t), \rho(t)] where H is the interaction Hamiltonian. My goal is to show that with the knowledge, if we have an initially uncorrelated state
\rho(t_0) = \rho_A(t_0) \otimes \rho_B(t_0)
then the state remains uncorrelated for all time t \geq 0

The Attempt at a Solution


This pre-master equation comes from the fact that we've assumed the propagator G(s,t) = \mathrm{exp}\left[ \alpha \int_s^t QL(\tau) d\tau \right] is approximated by identity (which occurs in the weak coupling limit). I need to show that in this weak coupling limit, the states do not become entangled (intuitively reasonable), though I can't think of how to show that the evolution according to the above differo-integral equation keeps the states uncorrelated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody has any ideas?
 
Well, this is just an idea but; you might try showing that \rho(t) = \rho_A(t) \otimes \rho_B(t) is a solution, and then perhaps see if there might be some uniqueness theorem you could appeal to that guarantees it's the only solution given the initial condition \rho(t_0) = \rho_A(t_0) \otimes \rho_B(t_0)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top