Mass difference between charged and uncharged battery - Special Relativity

EnSlavingBlair
Messages
34
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



A rechargeable AA battery with a mass of 25.0g can supply a power of 1.20W for 50.0mins.
What is the difference in mass between a charged and an uncharged battery?

Homework Equations



W = Pt
W = K = gmc^2 - mc^2
where g = 1/(1-(v/c)^2)^(-1/2)
E (total) = gmc^2 = K + E (rest) = K + mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution



W = 1.20 * 3.00x10^3 = 3600J = K

I am unsure of where to go from there, or even if this is the right way to start. The question does not make it clear (for me) if the 25.0g of the battery relates to the rest energy or the charged energy. Assuming it was clear which the mass relates to, I do not know what to use for the velocity in g.

There is also the possibility (in my mind, at least) that in part this is a trick question. That there is no mass difference, as while the battery is not in use the electrons are not moving. But I'm sure that's not what the question means, as it goes on to ask what fraction of the total mass the mass difference is.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I may have just solved it.

2. Homework Equations

E = W = Pt

Dm = DE/c^2 (where D is delta)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I read this in a textbook

"Wherever additional energy DE in any form is stored in an object, the rest mass of the object is increased by DE/c^2"
-Paul A. Tiper 1978, Modern Physics, Worth Publishers, Inc. New York

Which I take to mean (in relation to my question)

DE = K = W = Pt = 1.2*5400 = 6480J

As the kinetic energy is the change in energy in the system, allowing DE = W

Dm = DE/c^2 = 6480/(3*10^8)^2 = 7.2*10^-14 kg

I'm fairly sure this is correct, but a second opinion never goes astray :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top