Mass Distribution & Center of Mass: Why Does 1/r^3 Not Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter M-Speezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
In discussions about mass distribution and center of mass, the focus is on the implications of different mathematical models, particularly the 1/r^3 distribution. Evaluating this model leads to an infinite mass when integrating from 0 to R, which contrasts sharply with the more manageable 1/r^2 distribution. The conversation highlights the distinction between theoretical calculations and physically realizable mass densities. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding which distributions are feasible in real-world scenarios. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the complexities involved in applying mathematical models to physical systems.
M-Speezy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
For center of mass problems, it's possible to use a variable mass distribution. For a half cylinder, I've been looking at different mass distributions (constant, 1/r, 1/r^2, etc.) My teacher pointed out that at some point it runs into problems. I found that this was the case at 1/r^3, as you evaluate ln(r) from 0 to R, which gives infinite mass. Could someone please provide a physical explanation as to why this is so different from 1/r^2? (Which gives half the diameter times the charge density magnitude, by the way).

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did the maths - didn't you notice the difference during the calculation?
Your teacher pointed out that "it" runs into problems... what is "it"?
 
The math shows the theoretical distributions of mass, not necessary to be physically possible for any power of 1/r. So it's really a matter of discussing what actual densities are possible. You also asked to give a physical explanation to a seemingly math confusion, so you may want to specify what your asking.
 
Back
Top