Mass in relation to Tangential Force

AI Thread Summary
A child applies a tangential force of 42.4 N on a merry-go-round with a radius of 2.20 m, causing it to reach an angular speed of 0.0870 rev/s in 4.50 seconds. The correct approach involves using the torque formula, τ = Iα, where I is the moment of inertia and α is angular acceleration. It is essential to convert angular speed to radians per second for accurate calculations. The initial attempt at calculating mass was incorrect due to a miscalculation and misunderstanding of torque. After clarifying these points, the problem was successfully solved.
to819
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A child exerts a tangential 42.4 N force on the rim of a disk-shaped merry-go-round with a radius of 2.20 m. If the merry-go-round starts at rest and acquires an angular speed of 0.0870 rev/s in 4.50 s, what is its mass?

Homework Equations


t=I\alpha
I=.5mr2

The Attempt at a Solution


42.4=.5*2.22*.8087*m
m=21.665

Would the above be correct? I'm hesitant about entering it as I only have one more attempt to solve this problem. If not would converting the revolutions per second into radians per second be the right thing to do? Anyone see anything I'm missing? Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is mistake in your formula.

Firstly, torque formula is \tau = F.R.sin(\theta) (\theta is angle between F and R)

Besides, torque can be found by using this formula: \tau = I. \alpha (\alpha is angular acceleration)

p/s: what is '0.8087' number in your calculation? I don't get it :(
 
Ah, thank you for that. That number was me mistyping 0.0870. Should I convert the angular speed to radians per second before I solve for angular acceleration or leave it as is?
 
Try doing dimensional analysis. If you convert to radians, you'll get an angular acceleration in radians/s^2. If you leave it as is, you'll get an acceleration in revs/s^2. Both are correct, but the formula torque=I*alpha requires that alpha be in radians per second squared.
 
Solved for it correctly thanks to the help of both of you. Thank you both.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top