Mass of Planet Using Radius and Doppler Effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a distant planet based on the observed Doppler effect of a spacecraft's radio signal. The spacecraft orbits at a radius of 128,000 km, with a wavelength variation between 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m. The initial calculation yielded a mass of approximately 2.48×10^18 kg, which was unexpectedly low compared to the expected range of 10^20-28 kg. A key issue identified was the incorrect unit conversion from kilometers to meters for the radius and the gravitational constant. The participant acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
Linuxkid
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine you are observing a spacecraft moving in a circular orbit of radius 128,000 km around a distant planet. You happen to be located in the plane of the spacecraft 's orbit. You find that the spacecraft 's radio signal varies periodically in wavelength between 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m. Assuming that the radio is broadcasting normally, at a constant wavelength, what is the mass of the planet?


Homework Equations


M= \displaystyle{\frac{rv^2}{G}}; \space<br /> <br /> where \space G= 6.67\times10^{-11} \space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2},<br /> <br /> \space r \space is \space km, \space and \space v \ is \space<br /> km/s <br />



The Attempt at a Solution



Well, as we have a change in wavelength 2.99964 m and 3.00036 m respectively, the original signal should equal 3.00000m. With the formula from my textbook ( "Astronomy" 6th edition by Chaisson and McMillan, page 63), \frac{apparent\space \lambda}{true \space \lambda} -1 = speed \space in \space c Then I multiply it by c and convert meters to kilometers and get\approx 36 km/s.

I input r and G as G= 6.67\times10^{-11} \space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}, \space r= 128, 000 km.


So: M= \displaystyle{\frac{(128000km)*(36 km/s)^2}{6.67\times 10^{-11}\space m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}}} = 2.48\times10^{18} kg.


When I input this answer into the website in which we do our homework by, it gives me a lousy red X. I'm sure I messed up, because I was expecting a planet approximately in the 10^20-28 kg range.


Regardless, I've been stuck on this for a bit. Help is much appreciated.





Nikos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your units, I think you are not converting km to m.
 
possibly you are using different values for your constants, or you have rounded off differently?
[edit]ah - your value for G has length in meters.
 
Hey there,


Aha! I missed that my constant was in meters.



Honest mistake. Thanks a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top