Mass - Spring - damper in Parallel

In summary, the conversation is about determining the transfer function for a mass-spring-damper mechanism, where force is the input and displacement is the output. The conversation includes discussions on the equations involved such as spring force, damping force, and force, as well as the attempt at finding a solution and using the inverse Laplace identity to determine the output in the time domain. There is also a mention of how to represent a situation where the damping ratio is greater than one in a graph.
  • #1
kjay262
5
0

Homework Statement


The problem is to determine the transfer function where force F is input and displacement x is output in the mass-spring-damper mechanism.

Homework Equations


Spring Force = kx [k:spring constant]
Damping Force = Cx [C:damping coefficient]
Force = (Mass)(acceleration)

The Attempt at a Solution


Attempt at solution is in picture. I am interested to know if I am following the correct methodology and if I am missing anything.
 

Attachments

  • 10273955_10154109711405307_3235781433148029459_n.jpg
    10273955_10154109711405307_3235781433148029459_n.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 788
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
****EDIT**** not in parallel, IN SERIES
 
  • #3
The differential equations look correct. That was the hard part. I haven't look over the part about the development of the transform, but that shouldn't have been a problem.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
If the input force is a unit impulse the transfer function is equal to the output displacement in the complex domain. I'm struggling to determine the x(t) that is the output in the time domain, which is basically the inverse laplace of the transfer function. I using the identity (attached below), however the answer introduces a complex value, am I missing something.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Inverse Laplace Identity

Using the identity attached to determine the inverse laplace of the transfer function
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2014-05-21 13.11.30.png
    Screenshot 2014-05-21 13.11.30.png
    15.7 KB · Views: 821
  • #6
Multiply numerator and denominator by cs+k. See if this simplifies things.

Chet
 
  • #7
What if you have a situation where [itex]\xi[/itex] is greater than one (according to the identity image attached above) this would result in a complex number, yes? How would that be represented in graph?
 
  • #8
kjay262 said:
What if you have a situation where [itex]\xi[/itex] is greater than one (according to the identity image attached above) this would result in a complex number, yes? How would that be represented in graph?
Factor the denominator using the quadratic formula, and then resolve the transform into partial fractions, and you will then be able to answer your own question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top