I Master` Equation for the Penrose-Diosi wavefunction collapse

Agrippa
Messages
77
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
Hope you'll help me understand specific aspects of the equation better
I'm trying to understand equation 209 on page 81 here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4325.pdf

Here's what I understand so far:
- We are to imagine a system in a superposition of |X> and |X'>, where these describe distinct particle configurations.
- On the RHS of the eqn, the first term is Schoredinger evolution, the second term represents effects of objective collapse.
- The term [tau-d(X, X')] gives a number, which represents the average time for a collapse of this superposition to occur. This is calculated in terms of the gravitational energy required to create system S1 in |X> and system S2 in |X'> starting with S1 and S2 both being in state |X>.

Here's what I don't yet understand?
- What is the exact meaning of the LHS term, in particular, what does it mean to sandwich the density operator of the system between the two eigenstates of the superposition like this?
- Why does the first rho on the RHS of the eqn not have a hat on it, whereas the other two rhos do?
- Why do we take [tau-d(X, X')] to the power of -1?
- What is the physical significance of the two subtraction signs? e.g. what happens if the first is deleted, or the second is changed to addition?

Hope you can help! :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p.s. this thread concerns the master equation for Penrose-Diosi collapse (as opposed to, for example, the state vector evolution equation for Penrose-Diosi collapse). It is PhysForum editors that keep changing the title from "Master equation for..." to the slightly less sexy "Mastering this equation for..."
 
Moderator's note: Thread title restored.
 
  • Like
Likes Agrippa and berkeman
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top