Master Logarithmic Functions with Our Homework Statement - [Insert Company Name]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the logarithmic equation \(\log_{2n}(1944) = \log_{n}(486\sqrt{2})\). Participants suggest using the change of base formula to rewrite the logs for easier manipulation. Key insights include recognizing that \(\log(2n) = \log(n) + \log(2)\) and reformulating the equation accordingly. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the components of the logarithmic expressions. Ultimately, the original poster finds clarity on how to proceed with the problem.
xRadio
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First thing I would do is change the bases so they are equivalent.
 
Feldoh said:
First thing I would do is change the bases so they are equivalent.

How would you do that though =/
 
Change of base formula:

log_a b = \frac{log_c b}{log_c a} where c is the new base
 
kk ty
 
The problem.

I'll write the problem out because your image is a little hard to see.

If \log_{2n}(1944)=\log_{n}(486\sqrt{2}), determine the value of n^{3}

Let me know if you have more problems with this, I am fresh on log functions.
 
Last edited:
kk sooo log 1944/ log 2n = log 486/2 / log n

Do the logs cancel?
 
Last edited:
xRadio said:
kk sooo log 1944/ log 2n = log 486/2 / log n

Do the logs cancel?

Did you change to base 10? is that why your not placing the bases? and in the log to your right, I suppose that's not 486/2 but 486\sqrt{2}?
 
Last edited:
yea it is that but i didnt know how to do the thingie
 
  • #10
do the logs cancel?
 
  • #11
Oh wow... That problem is interesting I actually think there is a better way to solve it.
 
  • #12
xRadio said:
yea it is that but i didnt know how to do the thingie

Since we don't know what you mean by "thingie", that tells us nothing!

You have already been told that you can write the equation as
\frac{log(1944)}{log(2n)}= \frac{log(468)}{log(n)}
Do you see that log(2n)= log(n)+ log(2)?
And that you can rewrite that equation as
\frac{1944}{log(n)+ log(2)}= \frac{log(468)}{log(n)}

I haven't specified the base of "log" because it could be anything. Choose base 10 if you like or natural logarithms. In any case, log(1944), log(2), and log(468) are numbers.

Could you solve an equation like
\frac{A}{x+ B}= \frac{C}{x}

and do you see why your equation is of that form?
 
  • #13
Hallsofivy said:
\frac{1944}{log(n)+ log(2)}= \frac{log(468)}{log(n)}

Umm, by this don't you mean:
\frac{\log1944}{\log(n)+\log(2)}=\frac{log(486\sqrt{2})}{log(n)}
 
  • #14
yea thanks but, i was able to find out what to do.
 
  • #15
matadorqk said:
Umm, by this don't you mean:
\frac{\log1944}{\log(n)+\log(2)}=\frac{log(486\sqrt{2})}{log(n)}
Yes, don't know why I dropped the \sqrt{2}.
 
Back
Top