Master Thesis Topic: Fibre/Laser Optics vs Phase Field Models

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a graduate student with a BS in Physics who is deciding between two thesis options: experimental work in fibre/laser optics and theoretical/computational work in phase field models. The student expresses a preference for the second option due to a passion for computational physics and flexibility in the balance between theory and numerical work. However, concerns arise regarding job security and PhD opportunities associated with the second option, which seem less favorable compared to the first. The first option, while less appealing due to a lack of interest in experimental work, is noted for its strong job prospects and a higher likelihood of continuing into a PhD program. The conversation highlights the importance of balancing personal interest with career opportunities when making academic decisions.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have a BS in Physics, and have to begin my master thesis in 3 months. During the past couple of weeks, I have been talking to various professors at my university, and I have narrowed it down to either

  • First option: Fibre/laser optics (experimental)
  • Second option: Phase field models (theoretical/computational)

First option During my undergraduate studies I never really liked doing experimental physics.However, I followed basically all optics/laser courses, since I find them particularly interesting and they didn't require much experimental work. What I like about doing this is that PhD/job prospects afterwards will be pretty good according to my professor. Most of his master students have either gone straight to the industry or continued with a PhD.

Second option I have always loved computational physics, and I will have the possibility of doing my thesis with a heavy load of computational methods such as Finite Element Methods and such. My professor told me that I basically decide by myself what the ratio is between theory and numerical work -- this I like very much. What bothers me is that I don't see the same security after the thesis as I do with the first option, and I would hate to end up some place where my MS is essentially useless. Also, the possiblity of a PhD seems lower here than at the first option.



The courses during my MS have basically been divided 50/50 between quantum/laser optics and FEM. Now that I have put my thoughts to paper, I would like to get some feedback. Of course I don't expect anybody to tell me what to pick, but if you have an opinion or any other useful experiences, feel free to let me know.

Best.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the first thing gives you job and PhD prospects, then I'd go with that. There's no use in doing something interesting that turns out useless in the end.

That said, is it really the case that the second subject will not be of much use?? Perhaps it's more applicable then you think, but I'll let the physics people answer this.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top