Mastering Limits: Solving \lim_{x\rightarrow 0+} x^{x^2} Using L'Hopital's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter laker88116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit \(\lim_{x\rightarrow 0+} x^{x^2}\) can be approached by taking the natural logarithm, leading to \(\ln y = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} x^2 \ln x\). This expression can be transformed into a form suitable for L'Hôpital's Rule by rewriting it as \(\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} \frac{\ln x}{\frac{1}{x^2}}\). After applying L'Hôpital's Rule, the limit can be evaluated, allowing for the calculation of \(y\) as \(e^z\). Clarifications were made regarding the interpretation of the expression to ensure it was understood as \(x^{x^2}\) rather than \((x^x)^2\). The discussion ultimately led to a clearer understanding of the limit's evaluation process.
laker88116
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
\lim x \rightarrow 0+ x^x^2. This should read x^x^2 if that isn't clear. I am not sure where to start. I know that I need to use L'Hopitals Rule and I know that I need to get this in a form of \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}. Any suggestions on what else to do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, if you take logs of both sides, what could you get?
Let y = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0 ^ +} x^{(x ^ 2)}
So:
\ln y = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0 ^ +} x ^ 2 \ln x = z
Now, to find:\lim_{x \rightarrow 0 ^ +} x ^ 2 \ln x, you can use L'Hopital rule. Rewrite it as:
z = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0 ^ +} x ^ 2 \ln x = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0 ^ +} \frac{\ln x}{\frac{1}{x ^ 2}}
So y = e ^ z.
Viet Dao,
 
But how do you know that its isn't (x^x)^2? I understand what you are saying though and it makes perfect sense, I just wasn't sure where to break it up.
 
Because (x^x)^2 = x^{2x} and it would seem silly to write it that way.
 
Ok, well I understand now I was able to interpret it after VietDao29 did most of the work, but anyways, thanks for the help I see it now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top