MasteringPhysics: Find the angle between the point charges.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle θ between two point charges that repel each other. The user applies relevant equations, including Coulomb's law and the relationship between forces, but struggles with solving for θ using Wolfram Alpha. Participants suggest using the small angle approximation, where sinθ and tanθ can be approximated as θ in radians. After several attempts and clarifications, the user discovers a mistake in their charge value, which leads to finding the correct answer of 4.1 degrees. The conversation highlights the importance of careful variable management in physics problems.
danielhep
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2017-3-10_22-15-30.png

Two m = 4.0 g point charges on 1.0-m-long threads repel each other after being charged to q = 80 nC , as shown in the figure. What is the angle θ? You can assume that θ is a small angle.

Homework Equations


Fe=kq2/r2
F=ma
Fg=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


Equation 1:[/B]
r = 2sinθ
Fe=kq2/(2sinθ)2
Equation 2:
tanθ=Fe/Fg
Fgtanθ=Fe
Combining Them:
Fgtanθ=kq2/(2sinθ)2
Fgtanθ=kq2/(4(sinθ)2)
(sinθ)2tanθ=kq2/(4Fg)
(sinθ)2tanθ=kq2/(4mg)

Okay, so now I have an equation with all the thetas on one side. So I tried to plug it into Wolfram Alpha to solve for theta, but it is giving me some really weird results. I'm not quite sure where I went wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here's the Wolfram Alpha link. Thanks!

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...*(8*10^-9)^2/(4*4*10^-3*9.8)+for+x+in+degrees
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your equations, but
danielhep said:
You can assume that θ is a small angle.
..this means you can use,
sinθ=tanθ≈θ (in radian).
 
cnh1995 said:
I didn't check your equations, but

..this means you can use,
sinθ=tanθ≈θ (in radian).
Hm, I tried that and it didn't seem to work unfortunately.
Why is it that I can make that assumption anyway?

EDIT: Just used all my attempts and got that the correct answer is 4.1 degrees. Still need to figure this out since it's for studying.
 
danielhep said:
Hm, I tried that and it didn't seem to work unfortunately.
Why is it that I can make that assumption anyway?
It comes from the Maclaurin series expansion for sinθ and cosθ, where θ is in radian.
sinθ=θ-(θ3/3!)+(θ5/5!)-..

cosθ=1+(θ2/2!)+θ4/4!+...

You can see for small angle θ, sinθ≈θ and cosθ≈1 as higher order terms can be safely neglected.
Hence, tanθ≈θ.

danielhep said:
it didn't seem to work unfortunately.
Did you convert the answer from radians into degrees?
 
cnh1995 said:
Did you convert the answer from radians into degrees?
Yes, here's my link.
 
Your work is fine. You should get the correct answer if you use cnh1995's suggestion. (I did.)
 
vela said:
Your work is fine. You should get the correct answer if you use cnh1995's suggestion. (I did.)
Hmmm. 4.1 degrees? Can you look at my link here and see what I entered wrong?
danielhep said:
Yes, here's my link.

Thank you all for helping me through this btw!
 
##\sin^2 \theta \,\tan\theta \approx \theta^3##
 
vela said:
##\sin^2 \theta \,\tan\theta \approx \theta^3##
Ah yes, good catch.
I wrapped the whole thing in a cube root and the answer is closer to correct but still not there. I'm probably missing something simple but I am just not seeing it.
Link

EDIT: I got it! I had 8 nC instead of 80. Thank you all!
 
Back
Top